Most recent surveys agree
in one thing at least - the citizens' interest
in the upcoming parliamentary elections, just
like in the recent presidential ballot, is still
kept at high levels. The question is, however,
how and in with what the parties, the most influential
ones, at least, respond to the citizens' heightened
readiness to participate in public affairs.
The party offerings in the campaign again adhere
blindly to formulas intended to lure the voters,
instead of better understanding their aspirations
and more contemporary needs of Serbian society.
Kostunica, for instance, who initiated the new
elections, builds everything on the thesis that
Kosovo could be returned within Serbia's borders,
only if the people and coalition partners in the
current government would understand him better.
And he'll deal with Europe and the UN, he says,
easily, once he manages to renew the talks on
the subject. This is not only a fatal misconception,
but an open attempt to cheat or corrupt voters
with fake promises. And the inevitable thing that
happens when people insist on exclusivity was
engendered: bloody riots erupted in Kosovska Mitrovica,
for which the prime minister and his Democratic
Party of Serbia were mostly responsible. There
has hardly been any other event that managed to
distance us so far away from Europe and to destabilize
Serbia like this one did.
Other bids demonstrate also that larger parties
are prisoners to antiquated prejudice and the
constant habit to bamboozle. What radicals present
as their program is actually primitive populism
- better living is offered lavishly, spanning
from child care in kindergartens to secure jobs,
with construction sites springing up everywhere
- a blooming future, to say the least. They fail
to provide a realistic foundation for the fantasies
that basically boil down to the model of omnipotent
state, familiar to us from our earlier history.
Radicals' rather stale story that they will eradicate
crime and disperse thieves has this time taken
its most bizarre form. Toma Nikolic publicly suggested
that the police should work on commission!
There is, however, something else that the powerful
parties fail to observe, or prevent, for that
sake - Serbia, especially after presidential elections,
has become a dangerous and
|
violent country. Hooligans,
grudging about Tadic's victory, freely
demolished and burned foreign embassies,
robbed and plundered stores, prevented
rallies of those who think differently.
People are again branded as enemies, independent
journalists and the media are persecuted,
judges and witnesses are publicly threatened
or spectacularly murdered, radicals are
openly threatening our Hungarians, if
Hungary recognizes Kosovo. Many are now
prone, because of justified fears, to
say that our present is much like Milosevic's
time. It is far from that, of course,
but there are things that indicate we
are living a kind of degenerated "anti-bureaucratic
revolution". Where are we sliding
to as a society and why are these issues
neglected in the election campaigns, apart
from rare exceptions? How will the parties
that aspire
|
|
|
to democratic governance bring us back to normal?
And if they fail to do that, the elections and
the campaign will only turn into a big scam.
Today even a child would know that, what with
the inherited and the newly created tails, we
can hardly join Europe. Our parties are in this
electoral campaign again utterly exhausting themselves
in search of coalition partners, and are less
concerned with identifying Serbia's current and
lasting interests. It is more important to them
to bring to perfection the organization and technology
of governance, instead of truly embracing the
values on which governance is based. Inflation,
decreased investments, production, employment,
crimes and cooperation with the Hague tribunal,
the growing gap between the rich and the poor
in the society - it all falls into the background
and is mentioned rarely or never. The same applies
for foreign policy, which we have no idea as to
how it is managed and what is our strategy for
cooperation with the world. Who is stronger now:
those who will take us to Europe or those who,
with all their unreasonable narrow-mindedness,
are dragging us into Russia's shadow?
With all these meanderings we have frequent elections,
but few reassuring solutions.